Golestan University of Medical Sciences Repository

Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies

Jahanfar, S. and Ho, J.J. and Jaafar, S.H. and Abraha, I. and Nisenblat, V. and Ellis, U.M. and Noura, M. (2017) Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017 (3).

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Diagnostic test accuracy). The objectives are as follows: Our primary objective is to determine the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of different estimated biometric ultrasound measures using 30 thresholds with the actual birth weight discordance (BWD) as the reference standard (e.g. abdominal circumference (AC) compared with actual BWD) and to provide readers with a summary of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound measures for the diagnosis of BWD in twin gestations. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of available diagnostic ultrasound tests in subgroups of twin pregnancies at various gestational ages by week (less than 28 weeks, 28 to 32 weeks, 32 to 36 weeks and more than 36 weeks). To assess the sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic ultrasound test in twin pregnancies with same-sex versus opposite-sex twins. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic ultrasound test in dichorionic diamniotic versus monochorionic diamniotic twins. We anticipate the following potential sources of heterogeneity. Clinical factors: characteristics of study population (gestational age, chorionicity, inclusion of high risk pregnancy complicated by underlying maternal-fetal conditions, breast feeding). Methodological factors: study design (patient selection, prospective versus retrospective studies, time of test performance (time between index test and reference standard), clinical settings (tertiary centre versus community health care), multiple testing versus single testing for diagnosis of high risk pregnancy complicated by maternal-fetal conditions). Other factors: geographic area (high-, middle- and low-income countries), year of publication. We will try to address these issues based on the number of studies available. Furthermore, observer variability bias or bias related to interpretation of results cannot be formally assessed in the context of this review. © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: cited By 0
Subjects: مقالات نمایه شده محققین دانشگاه در سایت ,Web of Science ,Scopus
Divisions: UNSPECIFIED
Depositing User: GOUMS
Date Deposited: 18 Jun 2017 15:50
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2017 15:50
URI: http://eprints.goums.ac.ir/id/eprint/5081

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item